| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Please read (and join in the discussion on) the thread before voting |
| I'd prefer an hour-long show once every two weeks |
|
71% |
[ 43 ] |
| I'd prefer a half-hour show once every week |
|
28% |
[ 17 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 60 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Companion Kate

Joined: 27 Jan 2005 Posts: 2014 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 5:00 am Post subject: Season Two - THIS POLL NOW CLOSED |
|
|
Okay guys, here's the thing. It looks like, for Season 2 (which starts on February 1st) we can produce either an hour-long show once every two weeks, or a half-hour show every week. (These are minima. In practice, the shows are likely to be five or ten minutes longer than advertized).
There are pros and cons for both choices.
My personal preference is for an hour-long show every two weeks. An hour-long show allows for a much more flexible format. It allows for many more regular features, and is long enough to accomodate interviews. With a half-hour show, the scheduling is way too tight. Once you've taken out time for emails, news and so on, you've got pretty much no room left for anything but one article.
Of course, you could alternate - like, have a music section every other week, and a chinese segment on the in-between weeks. That's pretty much the same thing as getting half-a-show each week. If we're going to do that, we might as well make an hour-long show, cut it in half, and publish half of it each week.
The trouble is, even if we do that, We would still have to do work every week. There would still be stuff to do, including updating the XML feed, changing the website in several places, writing and publishing the show notes, sending out the email announcement, starting a thread on this forum, and so on. You probably don't think too much about all that ancilliary work, but it still has to be done, every time we release a show. And I would rather have to do that once every two weeks than every week.
Anyway, that's just my opinion. On this thread, I want to hear other people's opinions. (I think Les favors a half-hour weekly show, but I'll let him speak for himself). And once you've read all the arguments and had your say, please vote in the poll, so that we get some rough idea as to which of the two options people would prefer. That information will help (but not dictate) my eventual decision. If there's an overwhelming majority one way or the other, I am unlikely to ignore it. If it's round about 50/50, I'm more likely to be swayed by the reasoning within the posts.
So, let us know. _________________

Last edited by Companion Kate on Sun Jan 01, 2006 1:02 am; edited 4 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
kbachelder

Joined: 10 Jun 2005 Posts: 511 Location: South of Boston, MA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jax
Joined: 21 Sep 2005 Posts: 413 Location: Connecticut
|
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 6:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
As suggested I'll hold off on the poll for a few days.
Here's my two cents:
You all have done an outstanding job putting these out. You've heard from many how professional they come across and it obviously is not just the fans either. Universal put a link to you up on their site. The actors took time out of their schedule to be interviewed...which means the cast and others made The Signal talked about at more than one Hollywood party I'm sure. You re truly mighty.
With that said and done nobody but The Signal staff knows how much time and effort goes into creating these broadcasts. As a web developer/designer I know I struggle with aspects but the end user expects a clicked button to perform a function. As your end users we expect to click a link, download a show, and have it sound shiny. We see the end product, not the struggle that sometimes occurs. Your love of providing The Signal overcomes your struggles and we thank you for that.
The team knows how much it takes to create, produce, and make the podcasts available. You know what else you have going on in your lives. If once a week is too often, do them every other. If you struggle for content then do them once a month. As a fan of Firefly as well as your own contributions I ask that you don't get burned out. I trust you to come up with a release schedule that meets the needs of those on the team, but appreciate the fact that you even considered asking us.
Short version: once every other week is fine with me. If it comes out once a week I'll listen to them all though, and if it comes out once a month I still will listen.
For those in Hollywood who pay attention to such things, I'm sure they will be impressed that The Signal did not stop when the movie came out. That the Verse continues to be explorered and analyzed.
thanks again! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kbachelder

Joined: 10 Jun 2005 Posts: 511 Location: South of Boston, MA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xiao_ka

Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 49
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 7:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
I find that the segments that I enjoy the most are the in depth essays, the explorations, the featured articles, the interviews. The chinese of season 1 was candy. The news and emails are enjoyable snacks.
I would say that if going with a one hour show bi-weekly keeps the options open for more of the meat (so to speak), then that is really what I, personally, would prefer.
That said, I'll echo jax: I'll listen no matter what format you guys choose to go with. Weekly, bi-weekly or even monthly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kurya
Joined: 01 Aug 2005 Posts: 115
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi.
I echo the thanx and appreciation for the podcast. EVen before seein the comments I knew that on every 2 weeks is the best. Whatever is easier for you guys, and whatever results in the best product. Plus things will slow down a bit as the dvds are released, so I think its best to pace yourselves.
1 hour every 2 weeks
Prakash _________________ For info on future Montreal Shindigs:
http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/montrealbrowncoats
Canadian, canuck wannabe? Join:
http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/canadianbrowncoats |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Companion Kate

Joined: 27 Jan 2005 Posts: 2014 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jax wrote: | | As suggested I'll hold off on the poll for a few days. |
Take as long as you need. This poll stays open until New Year's Eve. I really do want to know what listeners would prefer. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jax
Joined: 21 Sep 2005 Posts: 413 Location: Connecticut
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I mentioned this a while back and this thread made me come around to the thought again. My thought was we'd run out of material further out if they just did a couple more episodes or rolled out a second movie. That led to thoughts about the collection being taken up for Mal's coat which led to thoughts of fan flicks done for Star Trek, the Mosquito parady, and other fan based efforts. It would be cool to tkae a collection to aid in a fan based shoot, perhaps contacting one of the existing groups that do such things. The problem probably arises with funds exchanging hands though. Anyways, to keep this on topic The Signal reviewing such a production would be cool. Cooler still would be for Joss to release a couple of scripts that could be deemed as canon and let the fans have at it. As an example look at how the Dead allowed shows to be taped, traded, etc and yet they still made money and faired okay. Another example would be how Doom allowed mods to be added and now look at how many games allow for that. It increases the fanbase.
Ok..something like this might be a good topic for a podcast. While I doubt tons and tons of folks read through all the fan based boards I bet most of the fans do download the podcast and listen to it. (The Signal must have those numbers....downloaded casts vs the number of messages read on this board each week). A topic of "possible marketing ploys to increase the fanbase".
Another topic might be ETW, of which a thread I partook in a while ago got real interesting. Covering that with some clarified canon tossed in by Joss or Tim would let the fans speculate further. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VaderDawsn

Joined: 03 Oct 2005 Posts: 151 Location: Firefly In My Mind
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I prefer 1 hour every other week, because it allows for more topics to be discussed and makes listening to the signal more an "experience" than a newscast. Also this gives busy browncoats time to catch up on the latest Serenity/Firefly news/discussion w/out feeling too far behind. When I listen to the podcast, I like feeling like I am still listening to to relatively fresh stuff. If I get too busy and miss and episode I feel a bit behind.
Of course I'll admit listening to an episode or 2 while at work.
I love the signal! _________________ -Samantha
http://sands-of-samantha.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SmellOfGreen
Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm sorry to make more work for y'all, but I have to vote for a weekly show.
There's just something wonderful about getting a weekly dose of The Signal. As soon as I hear the music start and Kaylee introducing me to Serenity, I feel like I found my home. It's just not the same when I requeue an old episode. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
williamjamesw
Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 2 Location: McGregor, Michigan, United States
|
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Personally; I would have to hope for the half hour every week. I'm on a dial-up connection and iTunes keeps timing out the connection before the download completes. I've had to make due with dirrect downloads from the main site.
Also two weeks seems like too long to wait. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lhoward

Joined: 10 Jun 2005 Posts: 271
|
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SmellOfGreen wrote: | | I'm sorry to make more work for y'all, but I have to vote for a weekly show. |
From our perspective, its about the same amount of effort to do a 30 minute show weekly or an hour show every other week. Don't let that influence your decision.
Les _________________ Tech Geek & Host of for Signal Serenity & Firefly podcast
http://signal.serenityfirefly.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sevens
Joined: 28 Jul 2005 Posts: 34
|
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think I would personally like a 30 minute cast every week...but I wouldn't complain about a 1 hour cast every week...I'd be happy with either one really... _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Companion Kate

Joined: 27 Jan 2005 Posts: 2014 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lhoward wrote: | | From our perspective, its about the same amount of effort to do a 30 minute show weekly or an hour show every other week. |
That may be true from Les's point of view, but it's not true from mine. We each have different jobs here, with differing time constraints.
| lhoward wrote: | | Don't let that influence your decision. |
With this I agree with Les completely. We'll take our own workload into account, so you don't have do. Just tell us what you want. That's what we want to know. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WildCard9

Joined: 12 Dec 2005 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am a late comer to The Signal. I was introduced to it at Dragon*Con this year, but did not get the chance to start listening until after Thanksgiving. I am trying to listen to one show per work day when in the office to catch up, which is not easy since more shows keep getting posted even though season 1 is over
I like the 1 hour format, it gives a lot of time to do many things without feeling rushed. Going to a bi-weekly show gives the crew more time to put the show together and still have a life. I work on a weekly internet radio show as their archivist, so I know how much time I need to devote to it every week, editing the show and all the work involved in making it available for download. It can get tiring and does eat into my time that I could be devoting to other things.
The weekly show made sense prior to Serenity's release. I think now that the Firefly news has slowed down, there is no need to force yourselves to finding something to talk about every week. And if this also means doing only 30-45 minutes every 2 weeks because that is all the material that you have, then that is fine too. Don't feel that you have to fill that set amount of time just because that is the format you announced. We're Browncoats, we can be flexible here.
Wayne |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
slgn*

Joined: 23 Aug 2004 Posts: 90
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
longer show, less frequent makes more sense to me... and frankly, it gives me more time to stay current.
xie xie Signal'ers _________________ What is a Browncoat? Get your scifi regalia at scifi for scifi
Got FarScape? FarScape is now in syndication! Check your local listings. FarWhat? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
YourLeader
Joined: 13 Dec 2005 Posts: 113 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On the whole I'd be happy with whatever you guys can do. If you can get an hour long show out every two weeks great. If you can only get a half hour long show out every two weeks that is still great. Heck if you did a five minute daily podcast that would be fine with me too. Y'all have done an excellent job with the podcast up to this point.
Looking forward to Season Two and beyond. _________________ Keep watching the skies! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
erico
Joined: 07 Sep 2005 Posts: 49 Location: Maryland, USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 3:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
As an avid listener of The Signal, I have to go with quality over quantity. If less frequent production means a greater depth and more variety to the show, I'd definitely vote for every other week. _________________ www.fireflytalk.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cubeslave
Joined: 04 Oct 2005 Posts: 4 Location: Lexington, SC
|
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 10:35 am Post subject: Longer |
|
|
| I like the longer, but less frequent format. I would really like to say something profound and longer, but much like finding new material after the film has come out, it would take more time than I currently have. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jseifried
Joined: 16 Dec 2005 Posts: 2 Location: Dayton, OH
|
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| as long as firefly talk comes out every week i would prefer a biweekly signal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hawkeyeseven
Joined: 18 Dec 2005 Posts: 1 Location: Apopka, Florida
|
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think the 1 hr. show would be better. that way I can keep up with the Pod Cast and also like you said you would be able to do interviews.
Thank You all for the hard work you put into this Pod Casts to keep us informed of Serenity.
I've been a fan since it aired on Scifi. back in 2002.
I've already ordered the DVD and the Soundtracks for the movie and the TV show.
Thanks Again and Keep Serenity FLYING,
hawkeyeseven[/code] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
writerserenyty
Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kbachelder wrote: | As a listener, I would prefer a longer show done every two weeks.
A devoted fan.
Kevin |
ditto. It seems like there would be more room for... extended feature episodes. _________________ yeah. it's me. deal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mvazeditor
Joined: 23 Dec 2005 Posts: 6 Location: Atlanta, GA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2005 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ni hao!
I would prefer a longer, more extensive show every 2 weeks. Many thanks to the entire crew for all of your hard work. I'm new to this verse and really enjoy the podcast.
-MV |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
toxicprof

Joined: 03 Nov 2005 Posts: 143
|
Posted: Sun Dec 25, 2005 5:31 pm Post subject: my vote |
|
|
I have to go with the hour also. I think you can do a better job of sticking to the format you have developed (and which works very well0 if you stay with the length for which it was developed. Also, I have a hunch that after the DVD deadlines pass you might occasionally strain to find conent. You would be less pressed by deadlines in the two week format if you came upon a "dry" spell.
The biggest reason though is that while the show length might be about the same, the production time for the half hour format would be a lot greater. You know better than we do that the behind the scenes work will not decrease by half merely because the length of the show does.
In the long run (It's not even a long run; it's more of a 5k fun run.) The 2 hour format will be better for you, and that will be better for us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bucho
Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Posts: 15 Location: Papakura, NZ
|
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The hour long show because of more opportunity for in depth stuff. If anything comes up in the 13 day meantime there's always the opportunity for bonus shows I'd guess. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|